Archive for the ‘SEO’ Category

Search Engine Advertising Choices

Written by Jim Hedger for WebProNews

Search advertisers are offered two basic marketing models, paid-ads and free organic ads. While there are advantages and disadvantages to both models, one clearly stands out as a better advertising option than the other.

Why is it then that advertisers from small business to mega-corporation tend to show higher interest in the more expensive and least effective of the two?

Most SEOs speculate that advertisers understand paid-advertising better than organic placement. As much of search marketing is conducted in-house and optimization is a learned-skill, corporate marketing departments lean towards the very simple model of paid-search. Organic search engine placement continues to be perceived as a nebulous service that can take time to show results. On the other hand, paid-ad placements tend to show up minutes after they are established and bidding one’s way to top spot is relatively easy.

With search ad-spends sometimes topping five or six figures per month, many SEOs shake their heads at businesses that refuse to invest a much smaller (generally low to mid four figure) sum on organic optimization. Ranging from small to mega sized operations, the number of paid-ad advertisers that ignore organic optimization seems to be growing.

Over the past three years, independent research has consistently confirmed that search engine users tend to click on the center column organic (free) ads far more often than on paid ads. Earlier this year, search marketers benefited from a number of published studies that clearly demonstrate the higher value of organic placements. While the results of this research is easily available to all, traditional and tech media stories tend to focus on paid-search advertising.

Two studies that made an enormous impact on the search marketing field this year are the Eye Tracking research conducted by Enquiro CEO Gord Hotchkiss and a whitepaper published by Lisa Wehr, CEO of OneUpWeb titled, ” Target Google’s Top Ten to Sell Online.” Gord’s study shows the basic F (or triangular) shape search user’s eyes tend to follow when examining search results. Lisa’s study found that search users are up to 6X more likely to click on the first few organic results as they are to choose any of the paid results.

A third study, “Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback,” released earlier this week by Cornell professor Thorsten Joachims looked at the links users found on search engine results pages and questioned why they choose which link. The results show again the importance of high organic search engine rankings. The researchers asked subjects to perform searches and looked at which results they viewed, which they clicked on, and what happens if those links are mixed up.

The Cornell study found that search users tended to view (look at) the first five organic results with a high percentage of them (approx. 2/3) viewing the top two listings with 42% of them selecting or clicking on that link. The number of search-viewers halves to approximately 1/3 of users viewing sites appearing in positions 3, 4 and 5. The numbers drop to about 1 in 10 users tending to view the 9 th and 10 th placed sites.

When a search user views search listings, it doesn’t necessarily mean they click on those listings. In this context, to view means to examine. Users tend to examine the text used to phrase the reference link as well as the descriptive paragraph appearing beneath the link before deciding to click on it.

This is especially true for the smaller number of searchers who view listings found in the 3 rd to 10 th positions as users who examined those listings tended to spend more time on the results page before choosing the link to click first. In other words, 1/3 to 1/10 of users are conducting preliminary research by seriously reading the text used to phrase the results before clicking.

This finding was backed up in another part of the Cornell study that showed when the same Top2 results were reversed, the text used in the link and description had a notable influence on which link the user clicks. The research found that when results were switched around, 34% of the users would still click on the site ranked in first place, even when they had seen the now #2 site there earlier.

In his Alertbox review of the Cornell study, Jakob Nielsen succinctly notes, ” If users always clicked the best link, then swapping the order of the two links should also swap the percentages, and this didn’t happen. The top hit still got the most clicks.

Read the Full Article

About the Author:
David is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.

Six Powerful Truths About SEO That You Don’t Know

Written by Jason DeVelvis for SeoNews

Everywhere you turn on the ‘net, you see something about search engine optimization. I’m convinced that 90% of the information about SEO is regurgitated crap. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll be the first to admit that you can’t do anything without a well-optimized web page. If your web page sucks, the search engines will treat it as such. But nöw, search engines have shifted their focus from the web site in question to the page that link to the site.

Many authors have covered the basic need for backlinks, so I won’t go into it hëre. However, if you’d like to learn more about backlinking, read another article I wrote: Crash-Course-in-Getting-a-#1-Google-Ranking

A quick note – You can view all of the backlinks for a site by visiting MSN.com or any other major search engine and typing in link: followed by the domain (ex. – “link:http://www.YourDomain.com”). I use MSN to find my backlinks, because they report all backlinks they have indexed, as opposed to Google and Yahoo, that only list ones they deem “important.”

Ok, nöw on to the 6 truths!

Truth 1: The Page Title of The Website Linking To You Matters

Yep, this one matters a lot. If the title of the links page includes one or more of your keywords, it will give the link to your site more weïght. So chëck into your prospective link partners, and look at the title of the page your link will be on.

You can usually find this pretty easily by using the backlink listing from above, as most page titles will be listed in the search engine results.

Truth 2: The Number of Outbound Links On The Website That Is Linking To You

One page can only have so much “importance” (Page Rank) to give away, so the more links on the page, the less the link to your site counts. Therefore, if your site is the only outbound link on the page, it’s going to carry much more weïght than a “links page” with 100 outbound links on it. I suggest a maximum of 25 links per page – many more than that devalues your link too much.

This one will require quite a bit of work if your link is on a lot of typical links pages. You’ll have to visit the page and manually count how many links on the page are outbound links.

Truth 3: The Content of The Page Linking To You

If you can get a link on a content page (as opposed to a links page) it will definitely be to your benefit. This is because 1) there probably won’t be many other outbound links on that page, and 2) the content on the page will most likely be related to the keywords in your anchor text, so the search engines will give your link more weïght. You’ll also enjoy the bonus of the targeted traffïc coming directly from that page. It can be tedious to find out which sites have your link on a content page. You may be able to find this out by checking the referrers’ section of your stats package – if you’re getting quite a few clicks from a certain site, your link is probably on a page with some content.

Truth 4: The Number And Type Of Links Linking To The Page That’s Linking To You

Wow, that was a mouthful. In a nutshell, the more the owner(s) of the site linking to you concentrated on offpage optimization while they were considering their linking partners, the more it will increase your link’s weïght.

This is pretty much worthless to try to figure out on your own, unless you have dedicated staff people who you can pay, or a program to automate this process and report back to you. You’ll have to find out the offpage optimization for each site linking to you, and that will take time you don’t have.

Truth 5: The IP Addresses Of The Pages Linking To You

Search engines look up the IP address of the pages linking to you, and links from the same IP are devalued accordingly. This is to keep webmasters from pointing all of their sites at each other. It’s not a bad thing to have more than one link per IP, but it’s more valuable to have lots of links from different addresses.

To find the IPs of the pages linking to you, go to WebRankInfo.com and enter between 2 and 10 links to chëck their IP addresses. However, this will become very tedious if you have hundreds or thousands of backlinks to chëck.

Truth 6: Whether Or Not The Websites Linking To You Are Deemed By Google As An Authority Website

This is something most webmasters don’t even know exists – “authority websites.” Most government (.gov) sites are considered “authority” sites. Or, sites like About.com, Microsoft.com, and others have also reached the “authority” status. This status is usually granted only to “supersites” that include tons of content and information, and if you can get a link from one of these sites to your site, it can be a huge positive effect on your rank. It’s almost impossible to know if a site is considered an authority, but any site with PR 8-10 is probably in this category.

This Sounds So Time Consuming, Is It Worth It?

In one word: Yes. Spend all the time you need to get good, targeted backlinks from pages with great offpage optimization. If you don’t have the time to do all of this by hand, look at SEO Elite. It finds all of the information I’ve discussed in this article (and more), and all I have to do is clïck a few buttons and give it a URL to start on. I’ll find the #1 website for a keyword I want to use, put it into SEO Elite, and then copy their linking strategy for my site. Most of the sites trading links with them are more than happy to trade with me as well, so it takes a ton of work off of my plate.

Armed And Dangerous

Nöw that you’ve got valuable information that most other webmasters don’t have (or don’t use), get out there and get your sites listed higher! Just don’t beat any of my sites…

To Your Success, And Your Number One Website!

About The Author
Jason is a long time web developer and the owner of Premier MicroSolutions, LLC, an Internet Marketing firm in Ohio. For more SEO tips and tricks, claim your FR-E-E copy of “Search Engine Optimization Made Easy” – Get it at PremierMicroSolutions.com today!

Why Google Blog Search Matters to Your Business

Written by Tinu AbayomiPaul for SiteProNews

According to Google, Google’s Blog Search is “Google search technology focused on blogs”. It includes search engine results specific to blogs not just in the Blogger.com community, but across the blogosphere at large. You can access it at http://www.blogsearch.google.com.

What the Big Deal Is

A lot of people have probably heard about this extra version of search Google has added and are greeting it with a big yawn, particularly since it’s still in Beta. So what is the big deal, anyway?

The big deal is that the top search engine in the world, which was already paying particular attention to blogs in regular search results, seems to make a subtle statement with the introduction of blog-specific searches.

Blogs are important enough to warrant their own special level of search, and not just as an advanced search option, but in their own search engine.

If search engines are paying attention to blogging that closely, you should be too — if you want better search engine results. Current fans of blogs will be able to search the freshest results so that they can see what is being discussed right now – information that is often as fresh as the news, and draws upon sources that the media-at-large either doesn’t have ready access to, or interest in.

So to those with even the most obscure interests or hobbies, a blog search powered by a top search engine gives ready access to fresh information on any subject that someone can blog about.

And if a blog doesn’t yet exist on these narrow themes? You can be the one to start the discussion.

Why It Matters to Your Business

Speaking of the media, this is likely to become one of the many tools that a journalist in the know would use in order to research a story, or to find out more information about a company, directly from the people who use its products or services.

Technorati, is at present, arguably a better tool, but it’s just not as well known as the Google brand. If you’re a power searcher, you already know what Technorati is. But the key thing to understand is that most consumers – even B2B consumers – aren’t as deeply involved in the internet.

But even those folks know what Google is.

There’s an even more obvious advantage to this specialized search.

Google Blog search has the unprecedented potential to bring the mainstream surfer into blogging, even more than Yahoo’s RSS Headlines pioneered the start of making RSS mainstream about a year ago. Why?

While many of your clients will fall instantly in love with RSS, it’s more fair to them to present its possibilities in a format that’s easier for them to digest. It’s not as hard to explain a blog – and if you can’t, you can simply tell them it’s a more frequently updated part of your existing site.

When Google’s Blog Search is brought more to the front in coming months, if your site gets into position to be visible when more of the internet population becomes blog-happy, then the traffïc potential for your site may prove to be enormous.

The proper use of one RSS feed in one of my content management systems doubled my traffïc, with most of the new users coming from Yahoo, this time last year. Another feed increased my daily traffïc another 75%, and brought me additional return traffïc as well.

At the time the margin between Yahoo and Google was wider than it is today — so the potential increase from being in Google boggles the mind.

How to Get Listed

According to the Blog Search Help Page:

“If your blog publishes a site feed in any format and automatically pings an updating service (such as Weblogs.com), we should be able to find and list it. Also, we will soon be providing a förm that you can use to manually add your blog to our index, in case we haven’t picked it up automatically. Stay tuned for more information on this.”

This means that if you’re already blogging – and responsibly pinging, you’re probably already listed.

If you haven’t been blogging, you’re in luck. This special brand of Google search is still in Beta, so if you get moving now, you still have enough time to start getting into position. And since the search currently seems to be focused on freshness and relevance, if you keep up the blogging once you start, and you keep your theme narrow, you could still dominate your niche.

Do It Today

The mantra for blogging before was that, proper blogging is a sure fire way to increase traffïc, as well as build stronger ties to your end users or clients, not to mention that it is the simplest of the many implementations of RSS.

Now, with all three major search engines paying more attention to both RSS and Blogging, you can get spidered more frequently, get more of your pages indexed more deeply, and be included in more searches.

You have absolutely no time to waste – if you’re not blogging already, you need to get started quickly. Many webmasters are hesitating because they haven’t been able to find a blog system that fits well with their site, or find the most popular tools too sophisticated for their needs.

There are literally dozens of frëe resources to help you decide between the standard systems that were originally built for the personal blogger, and the more robust solutions that are aimed at the medium-sized or corporate company – but that’s another article.

Whatever you chose, the important thing is to get started blogging today. You’ll be missing out on targeted traffïc from the most dominant search engine, from the most sophisticated surfers today, and sooner than you know it, the mainstream web.

About The Author
Tinu Abayomi-Paul is the co-owner of Leveraged Promotion, which provides many solutions for companies who prefer to out-source their online promotion needs. At Blog.LeveragedPromotion.com you can find out more about how RSS, Blogs and Podcasting can increase your online visibility.

How to Add a Search Engine to Your Site

(Written by Herman Drost for SiteProNews)

When visitors arrive at your web site you want them to find the information quickly otherwise they will losë patience and move on. A great way achieve this is to add a search engine or search box to your web site. Since most visitors are already familiar with using search engines such as Google, they can easily use the search feature on your site.

In this article I will discuss:

A. The benefits of adding a search engine
B. Types of search service providers
C. Where to place a search box on your site
D. How does the search engine work

A. Benefits of Adding Search Engine and Types of Sites Where It Can Be Used

1. Ecommerce sites - your ecommerce site usually has many different types of products so the navigation menu is not focused enough to rapidly find the specific product your visitor is looking for. Adding a search engine to your ecommerce site will help the visitor to easily and quickly zoom in on the product by entering their keyword in the search box.

2. Dynamic sites – search engines have difficulty spidering dynamically generated web pages. These are pages often generated from a database, so the information on your pages will not appear in the search engine’s index. Add a search engine to each page of your site. If a visitor arrives on that page from one of the large search engines, they can then do a quick search from that page instead of searching elsewhere.

3. Small sites - web sites that contain 5-10 pages don’t need a search engine because visitors don’t have to search through many pages to find the information. Instead, make sure you create a simple navigation menu at the top or side and bottom of your web pages.

B. Types of Search Service Providers

1. Atomz – Atomz Express Search is a frëe service where you can integrate basic search capability on your personal web site or on one of your commercial sites. It can be used on sites with 750 total pages or less and allows customization of look and feel to match your site’s design. Some third-party text ads are shown above and below the search results. You can use it for as long as you like for there is no trial period.

2. Freefind – features include the ability to customize search and results pages. The frëe accounts are limited to 3,000 pages or 32MB of storage. Site search is hosted on FreeFind’s server. It generates a site map for you, tracks visitors searches and indexes password protected pages.

3. Google Frëe site search service – searches only the specific domain(s) that you list when you create your search box. You can customize your results display to include background, text and link colors you select. The search box itself will reside on your web site. The search results page will be served by Google with the customized look and feel you specify. Google may serve ads on the results page. You can do an unlïmited amount of searches. You must display the Google logo on the web pages that contain the search box.

C. Where to place the search engine on your site?

1. Place the search box in a prominent location on your web page…preferably top center or top right.

2. Place the search box on all pages of your web site. Visitors may enter your site from any page.

3. Make the search box large enough to accommodate all search terms the visitor would use to find the information.

4. The search box should be a type-in box, not a link so visitors don’t have to wait for another page to load.

5. Limit the search results to 50 per page. Visitors losë their patience if they have to scroll through long lists of results.

D. How Does the Search Engine Work?

It works similar to the major search engines that search the web, however instead of crawling the web the search engine spider will search your site. The results of the crawl are stored in a database that resides on the search company’s server.

The company provides the necessary code to add a simple förm to your web page. This usually consists of a search box for inserting your keywords and a send button. When you clïck the button it sends the query to the search company. They process the query to create a search results page. This shows those pages in your site that match the visitor’s query.

The quality of the search results the search engine spider collects depends on how much information is contained in your site. Therefore take time to correctly optimize your site i.e. provide lots of good content that includes your keywords. Optimize your meta tags, images and create an accessible navigation structure.

Optimizing your site will not only provide focused results from your internal search engine but also boost your rankings in the major search engines.

About The Author
Herman Drost is the Certified Internet Webmaster (CIW) owner and author of iSiteBuild.com. Affordable Web Site Design and Web Hostïng. Subscribe to his “Marketing Tips” newsletter for more original articles. subscribe@isitebuild.com. Read more of his in-depth articles at: http://www.isitebuild.com/articles

Is Google Building An Alternative Internet?

Written by Jim Hedger for SiteProNews

Google is working on its most ambitious project to date, the creation of a global data transfer network that could effectively serve as a private Internet. Since the introduction of AdWords three years ago, Google has become the world’s largest media company and advertising vehicle. It has grown to rival Microsoft in scope and scale. The process has made it a fully globalized corporation.

Google has an estimated $7billion in the bank and employs many of the brightest brains in IT. It also has a reputation for being one of the best tech firms in the world to work for and has been known to use that reputation to headhunt intellect from its rivals. It is focused on the burgeoning Chinese market and appears to be performing better there than its chief rival Microsoft is. Google has the obvious capital and intellectual resources to do just about anything it wants to.

There are a number of reasons backing speculation that Google is building its own global digital communications network. Google has formally entered the telecom business with the release of a VOIP client known as Google Talk. VOIP is an acronym for Voice Over IP, which is a synonym for Internet telephone. In order to provide this service Google has had to acquire technical and physical resources that, along with other assets held by the company, point to the construction of an alternative Internet.

As Microsoft has so ably demonstrated over the past twenty-five years, there are a number of profitable ventures found in a space monopolized by a single mega-corporation. If that is the path Google is taking, building the infrastructure to capitalize on it would be considered the crucial but difficult first step. Over the past ten months, Google has been purchasing a large quantity of redundant fiber-optic lines, (commonly referred to as dark-fiber), in cities around the world. This fiber was laid during the boom years of the late 1990′s but left surplus after the dot-com crash in 2000. Speculation about Google building an alternative Internet has been circulating since early January 2005 when Google started buying and accumulating lots of dark-fiber.

Telecommunications industry news-source Light Reading today reported on some of Google’s recent real estate acquisitions. Google is leasing large amounts of floor space in or near major telecom interconnection facilities such as the recent leasing of about 1/10th of the rentable space at 111 8th Ave in New York, one the world’s largest telecommunications interconnection hubs. It is also said to be in negotiations for large amounts of space at enormous co-location centers (known as carrier hotels) on the west coast, with the goal of linking Google’s North American and Asian networks.

In early 2005, Google began issuing RFP notices to relevant tech firms for the development of a DWDM fiber optics network. The RFP process ended earlier this month and Google is currently reviewing bids from multiple tech vendors. Google is said to be planning to first establish a network in North America and then connect it with similar networks established in Europe and Asia. The construction of such a network could give Google the ability to deliver multiple branded media such as music, video, online telephone and other Internet services to every home in the United States.

DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) is a technology that exponentially increases the carrying capacity of fiber optic cables. According to an article in yesterday’s IPMedia Monitor (sub req.), only a handful of the largest telecommunications providers operate commercial DWDM networks. A small number of private DWDM networks exist but few are large enough to need such capacity.

Google’s need for bandwidth capacity is increasing rapidly. It currently pays the traditional telecom firms like AT&T who own the long-haul fiber lines a premium for bandwidth. Building its own data transfer network could be seen as a cost savings solution, especially as it could cost as little as $100millïon (in new spending) to construct one. Google already owns fiber throughout North America and around the world. It just needs to connect it all together.

Once connected, what could Google possibly do with a homebrewed state-of-the-art fiber-optics system? It could develop the kind of exclusive branded environment AOL originally dreamed of. It could capitalize on its recent innovations to provide life-service technologies such as Google Talk (VOIP) and interactive information resources such as local search alerts and the delivery of news, video and music files.

According to the IPMedia Monitor article, “… those who have reviewed the RFP say that Google’s plans extend far beyond cost-saving motivation, with an architecture that puts a Google-controlled hub deep within all major metro areas.”

Google’s stated goal is to organize the world’s information. A big part of that goal is to turn a profït while doing so. Google turns a very tidy profït each quarter but has long been seen as too reliant on one kind of income, paid search advertising. Google draws between 90 – 95% of its revenues from paid ads. The development of a Google operated data transfer network would give Google any number of ways to expand the number of productive revenue streams from 1 to 1+ more.

Then again, Google has always prided itself on its ability to organize the world’s information and provide it frëe of charge to its users. The cost of Google’s services is borne by the advertisers. Google might simply be exponentially increasing its online real estate inventory by enticing hundreds of millïons of new registered users to take a look at whatever it is they are creating. Assuming it is the coolest thing on the block when released and is faster and cheaper than its competitors (as most of Google’s new products tend to be), many of those new users will choose to stick around to use the services offered by a Google branded network.

Google appears to be preparing to become the world’s greatest data delivery vehicle. Perhaps this phase of Internet history will be summarized with the neo-business aphorism, “If you can’t beat them and you can’t join them, you can just make your own reality and make lots of monëy over there.” Google has $7big in the bank, much of it being investor monëy. From all accounts, it is preparing to light up and connect millïons of miles of dark fiber, starting in North America possibly as early as the first quarter of 2006. Today we wire America. Tomorrow we wire the world. On Saturday, we’ll do brunch.

About The Author
Jim Hedger is a writer, speaker and search engine marketing expert based in Victoria BC. Jim writes and edits full-time for StepForth and is also an editor for the Internet Search Engine Database. He has worked as an SEO for over 5 years and welcomes the opportunïty to share his experience through interviews, articles and speaking engagements. He can be reached at: jimhedger@stepforth.com.

Google Print Has Legal Support

Written by Jason Lee Miller for WebProNews

Though copyright law predates the Internet, case law has been established regarding the indexing of copyrighted material, and it has come out in favor of the indexer. Publishers who have issues with Google’s Print for Libraries project may end up with little more than hurt feelings.

Late in 2004, Google made a surprise announcement about an incredibly ambitious project to digitize and index millions of published works, with the aid of Stanford University, the University of Michigan, Harvard University, Oxford University, and the New York Public Library. The project was/is expected to cost upwards of $200 million over at least 10 years.

The entire text of books considered to be public domain and out of copyright will be scanned and made available online. For copyrighted material, the books will be scanned, and snippets will be made available structured around search terms with links to where the book can be checked out or purchased.

The publishing community, who had already signed up for Google Print for Publishers where snippets of copyrighted material were indexed for preview purposes, felt somewhat betrayed by Google as the Library project appeared to be sneaked in along side the Publisher program.

Two major publishers, the Association of American University Presses (AAUP) and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP), sent letters to Google asking them to stop the project as digitizing entire works of literature was a fundamental violation of copyright and would, in their opinion, hurt publishers and writers financially.

“…News of Google Print for Libraries came as a complete surprise. It had not been mentioned by Google representatives during any of the discussions they were having with our members, and Google’s subsequent explanations of Google Print for Libraries have only increased that confusion and transformed it into mounting alarm and concern at a plan that appears to involve systematic infringement of copyright on a massive scale,” read a letter written by Peter Givler on behalf of AAUP.

Technically that’s correct, Google has not received explicit permission or paid to reproduce the material. Instead, the search engine has gone through the 5 selected libraries which have given permission to digitize all or some of their collections. Though Google paused the project in August to negotiate with publishers, scanning is slated to continue this autumn with publishers having the option to de-list themselves from the project.

Google, as well as critics of the publisher groups, has argued that the Library project will only help to increase exposure and book sales. Publishers say that is yet to be seen, that no one has the right to copy entire texts without permission, that the implications of allowing Google to do so would pave the way for others to do the same, that they’re not convinced the system is secure, and that privacy issues (involving cookies and the Patriot Act) remain unresolved.

But all of these objections from publishers may yield little in court because of case law and Fair Use guidelines.

As this copyright analysis from Jonathan Band goes to great lengths to explain, ArribaSoft v. Kelly is one precedent ruling Google’s legal team could use in its favor. In this case, image search engine ArribaSoft was cleared of accusations brought about in a lawsuit by a photographer who claimed indexing his copyrighted images was a violation of copyright law. The ruling that ArribaSoft was protected under four separate provisions of Fair Use was upheld in two separate courts.

Here are some of the key rulings in that case:

Read The Full Article

About the Author:
Jason L. Miller is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.

Using Content Hubs To Promote

Written by David Risley for SiteProNews

We’ve all heard it before: content is king. And it is true. If you own a site, you need to post something interesting that people want to read before you can expect people to stop by. If your site is a content-based website, then you’ve already taken a huge step. However, if your website is a business website whose only purpose is to talk about your services, then you really should make an effort to post some content onto your website which is helpful to readers, frëe, and relevant to your services or website. If you do this, your site will attract traffïc from people looking for information, not just to purchase something. And with increased traffïc in general, you will get increased attention. And this increases your statistics.

Writing content for your own website is only half the battle, though. You have got to get people to read it. Just posting a website is not going to get people to come to it. It would be like building a business in the middle of the mountains. Nobody knows its there and you won’t get any customers. If you get your articles out there for people to read and the articles are written correctly, you can position yourself as an expert in your field and promote your own website. One way to do this is by publishing on content hubs rather than limiting it to your own website.

A content hub is a site which publishes articles on all topics (usually categorized). Those articles are freely available to anyone to use on their own website, newsletter, blog, etc. So, many publishers or site owners in need of fresh content for their website can go to one or more of these content hubs, find an article they like, and use it. They have to maintain proper credit to the author and publish the small author bio which accompanies the article.

Let’s look at this, though, from the author’s viewpoint – your viewpoint. Let’s say you are selling consulting services for search engine optimization. You have a site for your services, but you blend in with all the other such services. So, you write a series of articles giving tips to webmasters on how they can optimize their website. With your article you include a short bio of yourself. You include a mention of your services and a link to your website. You publish your article on a bunch of content hubs. Other websites, newsletters and blogs grab your article off those sites and use it on their own. Your article therefore spreads throughout the internet. Being that your site is linked with the article and is therefore on all of these other websites nöw (including the content hubs themselves), search engines who are constantly spidering the internet pick up on your article and index it associated with your website. This, in turn, raises your ranking in the search engines. And you get increased traffïc to your website not only from search engine searches but also from your article.

Nöw, let’s say you have done some research on keywords and you interlace your article with certain keywords. When the search engines spider your article all over the internet and associates with your website, it will raise your search engine rankings even more. There is a real science to this, and if done correctly, can drastically raise your internet presence in a short time. I recently had a meeting with the CEO of In Touch Media Group, a Clearwater, FL based company which is in the business of internet marketing. They use content hubs as part of their strategy for clients and they couple this with their vast archived data regarding keywords. They showed me the stats of one site which they have, in the course of just a few months, taken from essentially no traffïc to a VERY respectable level of traffïc. After getting an article out in the content hubs, they will follow up a few weeks later with a press release.

So, how can you publish some of your articles on content hubs? Well, the first step is to find and visit them. There are many of them out there, but below are some of the better ones:

GoArticles.com
ISnare.com
SubmitYourArticle.com – a service to send your article to a bunch of hubs at once
ArticleCity.com
ExchangeNet.com
Article-Directory.net
FreeZineSite.com

There are services to help you distribute to a large collection of publishers at once. I have used Isnare’s distribution service and it seems to work well. There are also distribution groups on Yahoo. Hëre are a few of them:

Free-Content
Article Announce List
Article Announce
Articles4You2Use4Promotion
Article Submission
Frëe Reprint Articles

With that, I wish you the best of luck in your promotion efforts. Start writing!

About The Author
David Risley is a web developer and founder of PC Media, Inc.. Specializes in PHP/ MySQL development, consulting and internet business management. He is also the founder of PC Mechanic, a large website delivering do-it-yourself computer information to thousands of users every day.

Yahoo’s Semel Wants British TV

Written by David Utter for WebProNewsUK

‘Be indexed or be forgotten’ seems to have been part of the message delivered by Terry Semel at the UK’s Royal Television Society 2005 convention.

At the RTS convention, an exclusive media event held in Cambridge, Mr. Semel advised executives to crack open the archives, dust off the old programs, and let them be indexed properly by Yahoo’s video search crawler, according to Reuters UK.

“Video search is a way to monetize some of the stuff that’s lounging around in warehouses and hasn’t made a dime for years,” he said at the conference. The BBC has begun to make some content available online, but no one in Britain yet has made a great quantity of content open to indexing by any of the search engines.

The BBC situation differs from that of other broadcasters in that it is funded with public money. Private broadcasters in the UK, and in the US, have shown a preference to keep content locked away rather than potentially share in an alternate revenue stream with an Internet presence like Yahoo.

While Yahoo has worked with TV networks like the WB to promote shows, Mr. Semel said to attendees Yahoo has no desire to become a TV network: “I don’t think that Yahoo or any other Internet company should try to become a television network. We will be nowhere if we have to create our own content.”

The first episode of the WB horror series Supernatural was broadcast on Yahoo for a week before its broadcast debut. And later in September, Yahoo will indeed help create content when it launches “Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone” as it sponsors and posts his war zone reporting from various global conflicts for a year.

——————————————————————————–
About the Author:
David Utter is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.

Perfect 10 Sues Google Over Image Search Results

This article was written by Jason Lee Miller for WebProNews

Google’s standard rule of not telling anybody anything until its
too late has caused worldwide speculation as to what on Earth they
plan to do with all that new money. A recent New York
invitation-only meeting with Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin did
little to change that silent trend.

In fact, the information coming out of that meeting isn’t exactly
flowing, leading some to speculation that Schmidt and Brin
exercised some version of the Jedi mind trick.

“There was a lot of talk about China,” cloudily recalls Howard
Ward, a fund manager at Gabelli Funds LLC who attended the meeting
among 300 other analysts and investors.

But apparently that talk of China wasn’t exactly explicit enough to
yield any concrete answers.

“They’re pretty opaque. They don’t give a lot of information,”
said (Benjamin Segal of Winchester Capital Group?**).

But it does appear to most that a portion of the proceeds from the
sale of over $4 billion in stock will be spent establishing a
stronger presence in the potential money well that is China.

David Schiller, a portfolio manager at JP Morgan Chase & Co., who
also attended the meeting but appears to have little to say,
reveals his guess for Google’s next move.

“Best-case scenario is they want to buy a bunch of search companies
or online gaming companies in China,” he said.

Equally as speculative about Google’s next move in China, is
Google’s next move in the United States, which involves lofty
notions of a free nation-wide ad-supported wireless network. One
wonders sometimes if Google’s imagination is as good as those who
talk about them.

Google opened up a second offering of over 14 million Google shares
at $295 a share earlier this week-a price TheStreet.com’s Jim
Cramer thinks is a steal as he expects stock prices to reach
$350.

“I believe Google can be bought here. There is a scarcity of
companies with high, organic growth in this market, and that is
why I expect Google to go up. Google is one of the few companies
out there with accelerating revenue growth, and at about 40 times
expected 2006 earnings, it is fairly priced given its strong
30%-plus growth rate,” said Cramer.

**Much of the information contained in this article comes from this
article out of BusinessTimes.Asia, out of Singapore,indirectly
perhaps from Bloomberg, which was vague, cryptic, and quotes only
“Winchester’s Mr. Segal.”

The Fight For Gmail

Written by Jason Lee Miller for WebProBusiness

Who owns Gmail? According to Benjamin Cohen, nobody yet-well, one guy in Germany, but he doesn’t count for much-and a British company is claiming the intellectual property rights to the Gmail trademark, even if the patent office hasn’t awarded anyone that credit.

The first battle for the claim to Gmail was brought by Daniel Giersch, a German entrepreneur, who actually does own Gmail, but only in Germany. Giersch recently blocked Google’s web mail service in the Land of Eternal Oktoberfest. But in the rest of the world, Gmail is still in dispute.

Enter Independent International Investment Research (IIR), a London-based research firm who set up Gmailâ„¢ web based email in 2002 with the domain gmail.co.uk, two years before Google launched its own Gmail.

Though the WHOIS registry lists Google as the owner of gmail.com since 1995, the company bought the domain from Garfield.com, the online home of the cartoon character, in 2004.

IIR has recently renewed its threat of legal action, according to Times Online. The British company has offered to settle for the 0.5% royalties generated from gmail.com, “conservatively” valued between $45 million and $60 million.

Shane Smith, founder of IIR, told Times Online that after 15 months of talking the matter over with Google, the two have not come to any satisfactory agreement, leading Smith and his company to knuckle up, no matter how much it hurts them financially.

“I feel it is up to me as the founder and the major shareholder. We’re not going to sit on the sidelines while a company uses our intellectual property rights,” he said. “We’re confident that we have the funding available to us and we’re girding our loins.”

But as Cohen, presumably the same Benjamin Cohen who became the youngest dotcom millionaire in Europe at 15 years-old, noted in his article, three companies have applied for an EC-wide trademark and have yet to receive it from the patent office. The German Gmail progenitor Giersch, Karen Griffith (trustee of IIR), and Google have all applied for the patent, and IIR beat Google to the European office by just a few days. In the US, there are six trademark applications pending.

In the US, as illustrated by the recent Apple iPod snafu where Microsoft actually won certain patents, application timing is crucial, as well as establishing a case of prior use. But Cohen says that in the UK, it doesn’t quite work that way.

“Although their use predates Google’s by more than two years, the dispute would be handled by Nominet, the UK’s internet name authority which tends to side with the larger party. They also seem not to recognise prior use, at least that was my experience when they handed iTunes.co.uk to Apple from my company, despite us launching three years prior to Apple’s product.”

If anybody other than Google is awarded the Gmail trademark, it could prove costly for the folks in Mountain View.

——————————————————————————–
About the Author:
Jason L. Miller is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.