Sitemap | Text-Only | -A | A | A+ | Accessibility

WNW Blog

MSN Versus Google

We know you’ve been waiting minutes, hours, and even days for the release of the Rock Em Sock Em Robot’s Fight from the SES conference. You can all rest better now because the much-anticipated rumble is up and ready for your enjoyment.

The first battle begins with a match-up between MSN’s Kelly Thomas and Yahoo’s Jim Lampley. By winning the best two of the three rounds, MNS takes the victory and is ready to take on reigning champion Vanessa Fox of Google, who won the sumo wrestling championship fight at the SES conference in San Jose.

To win this championship round, MSN or Google has to conquer the most of the five rounds. Fox begins confident and strong and takes out Thomas in the first two rounds. MSN strikes back at Google by winning the next two rounds.

The score is now tied with one round left to go. As if Google and MSN didn’t have enough butterflies already, the judges made a controversial equipment replacement. The officials made this decision in order to keep the competition fair for the final round.

So, who takes the role as the best search engine of this Rock Em Sock Em fight? We would love to share the results with you, but we want to keep you biting your nails in suspense.

About the Author:
Abby Prince is a staff writer for WebProNews and works in the WebProNews Video Department.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • BlinkList
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • Wists

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.